In Re the Welfare of S.S.E.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge
Appellant challenges his delinquency adjudication for felony theft. Appellant argues that the district court erred by allowing the prosecutor to impeach appellant with a prior delinquency adjudication because adjudication is not a conviction and cannot be used for impeachment. In the alternative, appellant argues that even if the prior delinquency adjudication is admissible, the district court never determined on the record whether its impeachable probative value outweighed its prejudicial effect. Appellant further contends that the district court used his pri- or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Van Buren v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re the Welfare of S. W. T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Dale v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. ScharmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.