Legal Opinion

Chandler v. City of Lanett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1982No. 81-271PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert Chandler, appellant herein, brought this action against the City of Lanett and Councilman Knowles seeking damages and reinstatement to a position equivalent to the one he had occupied prior to his dismissal. After hearing the evidence, the trial court entered an order holding: (1) the personnel policies of the City of Lanett satisfy Code 1975, §11-43-180, which requires the City to provide a civil service merit system for its police department; (2) that the City substantially complied with the provisions of the personnel policies; and (3) that it had not been shown to the reasonable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, the B. F. Goodrich Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Robert E. Robison v. Wichita Falls and North Texas Community Action Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Floyd Fetner v. The City of Roanoke, a Municipal Corporation Henry v. Bonner, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Mann v. City of TallasseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Evans v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Ala. State Tenure Com'n v. Conecuh County Board of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. City of Huntsville v. BilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API