Legal Opinion

Lee v. Missouri

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 1979No. 77-6066PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are granted.

In each of these cases, the trial court denied a timely motion to quash the petit jury panel. On appeal, the convictions were affirmed on the basis of State v. Duren, 556 S. W. 2d 11 (Mo. 1977). State v. Lee, 556 S. W. 2d 25 (Mo. 1977) ; State v. Minor, 556 S. W. 2d 35 (Mo. 1977); State v. Arrington, 559 S. W. 2d 749 (Mo. 1978); State v. Burnfin, 560 S. W. 2d 283 (Mo. App. 1977); State v. Combs, 564 S. W. 2d 328 (Mo. App. 1978).

We reversed the decision below in Duren because of inconsistency with the principles enunciated in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Daniel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. DurenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Yates v. AikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. MercerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. Delo, Emmett C. Nave v. Paul K. DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API