Legal Opinion

Imperial Manufacturing Ice Cold Coolers, Inc. v. Shannon

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2004No. S-11045PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A subcontractor asks this court to hold that the Little Miller Act provides it with a private right of action through which it can sue a school district for failing to ensure that the bonding requirements of the act were met. Because we can find no indication that the legislature intended to impose such liability on public entities, we affirm the superior court's decision.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The Lower Kuskokwim School District contracted with Clifton Shannon, d/b/a Arctic Construction Enterprises, to deliver, assemble, and install two two-bedroom…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Westbay Steel, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Native Alaskan Reclamation & Pest Control, Inc. v. United Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Arctic Contractors, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HouleAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. GeoTek Alaska, Inc. v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. HouleAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API