Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. United Dressed Beef Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

Defendant is the owner of a building at the foot of East Forty-fourth street, part of which it occupies and part of which it lets to Meyer Meyer & Son. The regular entrance to the portion of the building in which the business of Meyer Meyer & Son is carried on is from the street; they are butchers and there are means of access to their slaughter-house from defendant’s icehouse. In this *167passageway is an overhead rail, used by defendant’s employees to shove along sides of beef. Plaintiff, in June, 1904, was a customer of Meyer Meyer & Son and entered this passageway for the purpose of reaching…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Downes v. Elmira Bridge Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. McCann v. ThilemannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
  3. Forbrick v. General Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Porchey v. KellingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API