Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Currie

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1957No. 40493PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.

This is a legal contest over the ownership of a one-half undivided interest in a small tract of land, consisting of about twenty acres, described in the bill, and located in the western part of the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi.

Eugene Wilder and Mrs. Katherine Wilder Rawls claim to be the owners of such one-half interest in the proportions, respectively, of 8/18ths and l/18th of the whole. They filed the bill herein asserting such ownership in themselves and admitting that the other half interest was owned in equal proportions by defendants, but charging that defendants were also…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Gaddis & McLaurin, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Smith v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Hurst v. J. M. Griffin & Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Fox v. WilkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Shelby v. RhodesMississippi Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morgan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Clemons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Quates v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Adoption of JMM v. New Beginnings of Tupelo, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gavin v. HoseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API