Legal Opinion

Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier, McElligott & Swift v. Brodhead

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1993No. 92-6PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COOKS, Judge.

This case arose from a contract dispute over the payment of contingency fees for legal services. The parties are the law firm of Davidson, Meaux, Sonnier, McElli-gott and Swift (hereinafter Davidson), who filed this action against the Domiciliary and Ancillary Receivers from California and Texas, respectively, representing the now defunct Mission National Insurance Company.

ISSUE

The sole issue presented is whether the trial judge erred in granting a Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of Davidson. We conclude entry of Summary Judgment in this case was clearly erroneous…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Fowler v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Mamou v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API