Legal Opinion
Voliva v. Seafarers Pension Plan
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1988No. Nos. 88-1542, 88-1552PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
James C. Voliva first corresponded with the Seafarers’ Pension Plan (Plan) in 1981 regarding his eligibility for a disability pension. The Plan responded by stating that Voliva lacked sufficient service time. During the next three years Voliva corresponded with the Plan regarding his service time and the eligibility of various periods for credit. The Plan calculated the days of service on four different occasions. The last calculation evidently occurred as a result of a May 1984 appeal to the Plan’s trustees by Voliva.
Voliva filed suit in the Eastern District of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Danti v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Norman L. Horn v. Julius Mullins John J. O'COnnell Paul R. Dean United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Jay G. Collins v. Weirton Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- George W. Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gallo v. Amoco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.