Legal Opinion

Jost v. Synopsys Inc

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 1, 2022No. 3:21-cv-01793Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ANDREW JOST, No. 3:21-cv-01793-HZ Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER v. SYNOPSIS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Brian Donald Potter 3236 S.W. Kelly Avenue, Suite 101 Portland, OR 97239 Attorney for Plaintiff Erin Connell Orrick, Herrington, & Sutcliffe LLP 405 Howard Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Kathryn G. Mantoan Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 1120 NW Couch St., Suite 200 Portland, OR 97209 Lyubov Lerner Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 777 South Figueroa, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 91364 Attorneys for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API