Santosuosso v. Gibbs Ford, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtFlatley, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the defendant’s alleged breach of warranty and unfair or deceptive practices in violation of G.L.c. 93A, §11 in its sale of a 1986 Ford Econoline Van to the plaintiff.
After trial, the court found for the plaintiff in the amount of $2,500.00 plus interest, *168costs and $1,500.00 in attorney’s fees. The trial judge expressly found that there had been a breach of the warranty of merchantability, and that such breach also constituted a violation of G.L.c. 93A The court declined, however, to order multiple damages.
The plaintiff purchased her vehicle, a new…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Spence v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Calimlim v. Foreign Car Center, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Stigman v. Nickerson Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
- Forbes v. D&D Mulch & Landscape, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2015
- Harold v. RossettiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993