Legal Opinion

United States v. Janitz

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 18, 1946No. 3500cPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

Seven men were indicted, charged in the first count with conspiracy under Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 88; in the second, for unlawfully fermenting mash under Title 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 2834; and in the third, for unlawfully possessing an unregistered still under Title 26 U.S.C.A.Int.Rev.Code, § 2810(a).

The case was brought on for trial and resulted in a mistrial for reasons not material here. Divers motions were directed to the court seeking the suppression of the evidence and the dismissal of .the indictment as against all the defendants. The result was the suppression of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Mabee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lagow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. United States v. JanitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  3. Gorski v. Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API