Legal Opinion
Lagow v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 26, 1946No. 118, Docket 20397PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Per curiam
Both petitioners appeal from an order which directed the return of business records of the corporation, unlawfully seized, and forbade the use of the evidence against the corporation upon the trial of any indictment which might be filed against it; but which denied that relief to Lagow, the sole shareholder and officer of the corporation. Since at the time the petition was filed no indictment had been found, the appeal lies under Cogen v. United States, 278 U. S. 221, 49 S.Ct. 118, 73 L.Ed. 275.
We cannot understand what the corporation wishes more than it has obtained; and, as no point is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. De VastoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- In Re DooleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Morris C. Goldberg, Also Known as Moe Goldberg and M. C. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Alexander L. GutermaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Harry v. MohneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.