Legal Opinion

United States v. Morry Waksberg, M.D., and Morry Waksberg, M.D., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 16, 1997No. 95-5165PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises a question which, for prudential reasons, we will not decide at this time — whether, upon finding the United States in contempt for violating an injunction, a federal court may order the government to pay a compensatory fine despite its claim of sovereign immunity. The question is new to this court and to decide it we would have to resolve a dispute about the meaning of the Constitution. But there has not yet been a finding that the government’s violation of the decree caused any monetary losses.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Porter v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  2. Canning v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  3. In Re Sealed Case No. 98-3077Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. SteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Young v. Office of United States Senate Sergeant at ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API