Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Herman Ulysses Gumbs, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 11, 1957No. 24645_1Published

1ConcurrenceHincks, Circuit Judge

Obviously it is impossible to tell from the face of the information whether the two counts charged two separate offenses or only one. If the appellant had pleaded not guilty to one or the other of these counts, the proofs would have answered this question by showing either a single offense or two separate offenses, such possibly as Judge Chase, by drawing on the affidavit by Government counsel, has described.

Certainly the record does not show affirmatively that only one offense was involved. And, in my opinion, the appellant, by pleading guilty to both counts and thus foreclosing proofs which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fay Clinton Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. United States v. HarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API