Legal Opinion
Fay Clinton Harris v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1956No. 15576PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion to revise and correct sentence entered oil an information containing twenty-two counts, the first two counts of which charge him with violations of Section 472, Title 18 U.S.C., and the remaining counts charge him with violations of Section 495, Title 18 U.S.C. We shall refer to the appellant as defendant.
Defendant was represented by counsel at the time of his arraignment and the judgment and sentence sought to be revised and corrected was entered on a plea of guilty. The only counts here involved are counts one and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Pereira v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Clayton E. ScottCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Charles SchrenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Ex Parte GreenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- United States v. James H. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. John Conley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.