Legal Opinion
Shaw v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 19, 1995No. Civ. No. 90-3019. Crim. No. 86-30020-01PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KORNMANN, District Judge.
The Court referred this matter to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Moreno. The magistrate judge conducted an evidentiary hearing on October 13, 1994. Magistrate Judge Moreno submitted proposed Findings of Act, Report and Recommendation for Disposition to the Court on December 30, 1994.
A copy of the report and recommendation was served on the plaintiff as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff has filed his written objections thereto.
The Court has made a de novo determination that the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge should…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CuniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Stead v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1999
- United States v. TapioDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1998
- State v. CuniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999