Smillie v. Mendoza

Dependant in error had judgment against plaintiff in error in an action for breach of promise to marry, and the latter brings error.

The first assigned error which is argued is that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. Plaintiff testified that she and defendant agreed to marry; he says they discussed it but never entered into a contract to marry. There are many letters in evidence, written by the parties from which the jury might well conclude that plaintiff’s testimony was more credible than that of defendant. The verdict was rendered on a conflict of evidence, and will not be…