Legal Opinion

Doyle v. McCarrick

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1938No. 7,769Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

This is a proceeding to determine who are the beneficiaries under the residuary clause of the will of Sarah Ann Doyle, a spinster. At the time her holographic will was executed she had two sisters and two brothers living, to each of whom she *66gave by her will substantial legacies varying in amounts from $5,000 to $10,000. She left specific legacies to a great nephew, several great nieces, one niece and also to some old friends. This niece, great nephew and all of these great nieces are the descendants of the deceased’s then living brothers and sisters. She left the sum of $5 to the estate of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Gardner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Gardner v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Leary v. Liberty Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Arnett v. Fairmont Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API