Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re V.V.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 2010No. 01-08-00345-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEvelyn V. Keyes, Justice

I agree with the majority of the en banc court that the original panel opinion represents a grave departure from precedent in the review of parental termination cases for the reasons set out in Justice Bland’s majority opinion and that it, therefore, merits en banc review under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 41.2 to “maintain uniformity of the court’s decisions.” Tex. R.App. P. 41.2(c). I also agree with the majority’s determination that the record is legally and factually sufficient to support termination of appellant’s parental rights on the ground of endangerment of a child. I disagree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. In Re J.O.A.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API