Legal Opinion

Kenny v. Trowbridge

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 5, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Two motions are before the court. The first is on behalf of the complainant, to strike the answer as frivolous; the second, on behalf of the defendant for a bill of particulars.

By this bill a creditor of decedent seeks to impress a lien upon real estate owned by the latter, in an amount to be fixed by a decree of this court. It is the contention of the complainant that as a creditor of a deceased person owning real estate in New Jersey, he has a lien upon such real estate for one year or thereafter until a bona fide alienation thereof, by virtue ofR.S. 3:25-21, and that, under the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haston v. CastnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879
  2. Campbell v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Axt v. 61 Lincoln ParkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Smith v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  5. Crane v. DohertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asher v. HartNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  2. In Re KonigsbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1939
  3. Gentex Corp. v. Crew Systems Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2011
  4. Gentex Corp. v. Crew Systems Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API