Sagan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
In this action by the beneficiary of a life insurance policy against an insurer, we conclude that § 33-20-121(2), MCA, must be read into an insurance policy containing an otherwise valid suicide exclusion. Therefore, we affirm.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) issued a life insurance policy to Samuel Sagan on July 1, 1989, providing for payment of $50,000 in benefits upon his death. Samuel Sagan died on September 22,1990, as a result of suicide. Carol Sagan (Sagan) is Samuel Sagan’s widow and the named beneficiary under the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
- First SEC. Bank of Bozeman v. GoddardMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Dorn v. Bd. of Trust. of Billings Sch. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
- Lee v. Providence Washington InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Florence-Carlton School District No. 15-16 v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leibrand v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
- Therchik v. Grant Aviation, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- In re the Denial of the Application for Issuance of One Original (New) On-Premises Consumption Beer/Wine License, Town Pump of Wolf Point, 401 CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Enron Oil Trading & Transportation Co. v. Underwriters of Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.