Legal Opinion

Moore v. First National City Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

Motion to dismiss defenses. The first cause of action is one by a depositor against a bank for charging his account with $15,231.50 in connection with a check drawn by plaintiff for $231.50 and subsequently altered without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent. The name of the payee is also claimed to have been changed from Francis 0. Carr to Francis C. Carretta, without plaintiff’s knowledge or consent.

The defenses, one complete and the other partial, allege that: ‘ ‘ Plaintiff failed and neglected to exercise ordinary care in preparing and issuing the check * * * in that plaintiff prepared and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Critten v. Chemical National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Gutfreund v. East River National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. National Exchange Bank v. LesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sam Goody, Inc. v. Franklin National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API