Legal Opinion
Yazdani v. ACCESS ATM
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2008No. 06-CV-1482PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
Dealing with a person who claimed to be an authorized agent of Access ATM (appel-lee or Access), appellant Ardeshir Yazdani signed agreements to purchase and install an ATM machine in his coffee shop. He gave the salesman nearly $7,000, but the ATM never arrived, and the money was not returned. Access disclaimed any responsibility for the salesman’s actions, asserting that he was not an authorized representative and that it had not received any of the money. Mr. Yazdani now chai- lenges the dismissal of his claims against Access for breach of contract, fraud, and RICO…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bazarian International Financial Associates, LLC v. Desarrolloa Aerohotelco, C.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Parker v. K & L Gates, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Debnam v. Crane Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- KISHA WALKER v. FEDEX OFFICE & PRINT SERVICES, INC., JAMIE PARKER, NICOLE UGLOW A/K/A NICOLE FOLEYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Innerlight, Inc. v. MATRIX GROUP, LLC.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.