Legal Opinion

Kubik v. Igleheart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 1983No. 83-91PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The issue in this tort suit is whether an instruction on comparative negligence was properly refused by the trial court. The appellee, plaintiff below, was operating his motorboat in close proximity to appellant’s boat dock on Lake Norfork. Appellee testified that he was running the boat in a prudent manner when the appellant shot him. To the contrary, appellant’s testimony was that the appellee was driving the boat at a fast speed which caused wakes or waves that could cause progressive damage to his dock and that such conduct on the part of the appellee caused him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartsock v. Forsgren, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Collier v. Citizens Coach Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Potts v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Williams v. Mozark Fire Extinguisher Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Wilson v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Cragar v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API