Legal Opinion
John E. Quast and Nancy K. Quast v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1970No. 19636PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
John E. Quast, a medical doctor and his wife, Nancy K. Quast, have appealed from the judgment of the district court dismissing their suit for a refund of Federal income taxes paid for the calendar year 1964. Mrs. Quast is a party only because she filed a joint tax return with her husband for 1964. Hereinafter, Dr. Quast will be referred to as the taxpayer.
The record reveals little, if any, dispute in the relevant facts. Judge Ne-ville has accurately and fully detailed the background giving rise to this controversy in his opinion denying appellants’ motion for a judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reese v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Joseph D. Woddail and Susan M. Woddail v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Bonn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Paul j.ussery and Allean M. Ussery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Phillip L. Parr and Barbara M. Parr v. United States of America, James David Emerson and Nancy M. Emerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Eugene E. Hembree, Jr., and Belle D. Hembree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Weinberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
- Dr. Hollis K. (Iii) and Patricia D. Leathers v. United States of America Dr. William F. And June B. Blankenship v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.