Bumpers v. Community Bank
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where the undisputed evidence showed that defendant charged plaintiffs a loan discount fee for a loan that did not have a discounted interest rate, summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs on their Chapter 75 claims was proper. Where there were genuine issues of material fact as to whether Title America’s loan closing fees were excessive, we reverse the granting of summary judgment on that claim, and vacate the award of damages pertaining to that claim. Upon remand, the trial court may consider the question of class certification.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Dalton v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Kircher v. Putnam Funds TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bumpers v. Cmty. Bank of N. Va.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bumpers v. Cmty. Bank of N. Va.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013