Legal Opinion

Errato v. Bendett & McHugh, PC

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 21, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01674Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ROBERT M. ERRATO, ) Plaintiff, ) ) 3:23-cv-1674 (OAW) v. ) ) BENDETT & MCHUGH, PC, ) BROCK & SCOTT, and ) CITIZENS BANK, N.A., ) Defendants. ) RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Self-represented plaintiff Robert Errato brings this action for claims arising out of the foreclosure of his home. Am. Compl. ¶¶ 7–8, ECF No. 20. He alleges that Bendett & McHugh, PC and Brock & Scott (together the “Brock Defendants”) and Citizens Bank (collectively the “Defendants”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”),

15 U.S.C. § 1692

et seq., and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.