Commercial Research, LLC v. Roup
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE J. JONES
1 1 This case presents the question whether a health savings account (HSA) meeting the requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 228 (2006) is a "retirement plan" as contemplated by the Colorado statute exempting certain property from garnishment, section 18-54-102, C.R.S. 2018. We hold that it is not and therefore affirm the district court's order denying judgment debtor Gary S. Roup's claim of exemption.
I. Background
12 Commercial Research LLC (Creditor) obtained an assignment of a default judgment that had been entered against Mr. Roup in a Texas court. Creditor then filed the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Denver Post Corp. v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Jefferson County Board of Equalization v. GerganoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- In Re: Murray L. Deutchman, Debtor. Murray L. Deutchman, Debtor-Appellant v. Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Board of County Commissioners, Costilla County v. Costilla County Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roup v. Commercial Research, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- Fleury v. Intrawest Winter Park Operations Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2014