Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fleury v. Intrawest Winter Park Operations Corp.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA0517Published

1DissentJ. Jones, J.

¶ 29 I respectfully dissent from the majority's conclusion that an avalanche is an inherent danger or risk of skiing as defined in subsection 33-44-103(3.5), C.R.S. 2013. In my view, that provision does not expressly or by clear implication include avalanches occurring on open, designated ski trails within its definition; therefore, the grant of immunity in section 33-44-112, C.R.S.2013, for injuries resulting from the inherent dangers and risks of skiing does not apply to injuries resulting from such avalanches. Because Mr. Norris was killed as a result of an avalanche on an open, designated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Denver Post Corp. v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API