Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Maul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered May 1, 2008, which granted plaintiffs-intervenors’ motion for class certification, and denied the motion of defendant-appellant New York City Administration for Children’s Services for partial summary judgment, affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs-intervenors are mentally retarded and developmentally disabled individuals. All of them are, or were, in the foster care system under the aegis of defendant Administration for Children’s Services (ACS). Defendant New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Community Board 7 v. SchafferNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. In re M.B. Mental Hygiene Legal ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Heaven C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Brissenden v. Time Warner CableNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In re Miguel M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API