Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1985No. Crim. 23714PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, J.

The principal issue presented by this case is whether the trial judge improperly denied defendant’s motions for continuance. Defendant asserts that (1) he had insufficient time to examine California Jury Instructions, Criminal (CALJIC), and (2) he had not had the opportunity for eight hours of sleep the night before trial.

I. Facts

On January 17, 1982, at approximately 8 p.m., Gregory Leverich was playing cards in his home in Fullerton when he heard the sound of breaking glass. He opened his front door and saw a man enter through a window of the Smart & Final store across the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. ArbuckleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. CrandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API