Ingle Butte Ranches, Inc. v. Fronapel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Defendant City of Mt. Vernon (the city) appeals a trial court judgment upholding both a prescriptive easement in plaintiffs’ favor over land owned by defendants Mark and Theresa Fronapel (the Fronapels)1 and a right to use a bridge that the city built over the same land pursuant to an express easement from the Fronapels’ predecessors. Among other arguments, the city asserts that the trial court erred in upholding plaintiffs’ right to use the bridge because (1) a prescriptive easement against a municipality is prohibited as a matter of law; (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Clark v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Firebaugh v. BoringOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Brunswick v. RundellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bo and Lia Holdings LLC v. 2021 Morrison LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021