Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1992No. 119 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Thomas Diehl (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision dismissing Claimant’s petitions for failure to give timely notice under section 311 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 631.1

*225Claimant worked as an asbestos insulator mechanic from 1947 to June 1, 1987, for various employers. On August 19, 1987, Claimant filed petitions against seventeen employers under the Act alleging that he became totally disabled on June 1, 1987 as the result…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. York City School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Konitsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Radnor Twp. v. WCAB (Byrd)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API