Young v. De La Garza
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
Appellant’s suit upon a promissory note and foreclosure of a lien was answered by appellees by verified plea of misrepresentation and failure of consideration. By cross- action appellees affirmatively sought cancellation and rescission of the note and lien as well as recovery of money damages. Appellant’s motion for summary judgment being overruled, the case proceeded to trial before the court, without a jury. Judgment was rendered that appellant take nothing; that the note and lien sued upon be cancelled; and that appellees recover $4,385.33 from appellant. Appellant seeks…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Sparkman v. McWhirterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lampasas v. Spring Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Twelve Oaks Tower I, Ltd. v. Premier Allergy, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- American National Bank & Trust Co. v. First Wisconsin Mortgage TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- 718 Associates, Ltd. v. Sunwest N.O.P., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.