Legal Opinion

Stream v. Heckers

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 11, 1974No. 26191PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

Appellant Stream’s driver’s license was revoked by order of the appellee department of revenue pursuant to the implied consent law. On review by the district court, the order of revocation was affirmed. Appellant urges several grounds for reversal on this appeal. None are meritorious and we therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

The implied consent law in brief states that any person who drives a motor vehicle upon the public highway is deemed to have given his consent to a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood when he is arrested on the charge of driving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  2. Vigil v. Motor Vehicle Division of Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. People v. TeagueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Anderson v. Colorado State Department of PersonnelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Hancock v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Martin v. Super. Ct. in & for Cty. of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Gilbert v. DolanColorado Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API