Corson v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeai by the plaintiff, Mary E. Corson, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 20th day of March, 1905, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Kings County Trial Term. .
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, J.:
The questions involved in this case were fully considered upon the former appeal (78 App. Div. 481) and we desire to add. nothing to what was then said by the court, speaking through Mr. Justice Willard Bartlett, except that the case of Mullins v. Siegel-Cooper Co. (183 N. Y. 129) is authority for the correctness of the conclusion there reached that proof of numerous prior accidents caused by the defect complained of would have required the submission of the case to the jury. The criticism then made by this court upon the indefinite character of the proof of such former accidents…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Corson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaplan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960