Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Xilinx, Inc., (“Xilinx”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Xilinx’s declaratory judgment action against Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Papst”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because we hold that the district court has specific personal jurisdiction over Papst with respect to Xi-linx’s declaratory judgment action, we reverse and remand.
Background
Xilinx is a Delaware corporation that is headquartered in San Jose, California. Xi-linx designs, develops, and markets pro grammable logic devices for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Trimble Inc. v. Perdiemco LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- New World International, Inc. v. Ford Global Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Regenlab U.S. LLC v. Estar Techs. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. v. Plano Encryption TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Maxchief Investments Limited v. Wok & Pan, Ind., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.