Legal Opinion

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 15, 2017No. 2015-1919PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Xilinx, Inc., (“Xilinx”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissing Xilinx’s declaratory judgment action against Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (“Papst”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because we hold that the district court has specific personal jurisdiction over Papst with respect to Xi-linx’s declaratory judgment action, we reverse and remand.

Background

Xilinx is a Delaware corporation that is headquartered in San Jose, California. Xi-linx designs, develops, and markets pro grammable logic devices for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Trimble Inc. v. Perdiemco LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  2. New World International, Inc. v. Ford Global Technologies, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Regenlab U.S. LLC v. Estar Techs. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. v. Plano Encryption TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Maxchief Investments Limited v. Wok & Pan, Ind., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API