Legal Opinion
In re Reiner
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1992No. 90-SP-61PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Before us are two reciprocal discipline cases involving respondent under D.C.Bar R. XI, § 11. One is Bar Docket No. 315-89, the Perlowski matter, and the other is Bar Docket No. 143-91, the Pilson matter.1 In a single Report and Recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility covering both cases, the Board recommends that in the Perlowski matter, respondent be suspended for three years, nunc pro tunc to May 10,1989, and that in the Pilson matter, respondent be suspended for one year, nunc pro tunc to November 18,1988.2 The Board recommends that both suspensions bear a requirement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of CouryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re SheridanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re Glenn H. StephensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993