Legal Opinion
Trangle v. Rojas
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 2002No. 81190PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Colleen Conway Cooney, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Lutheran Hospital (“Lutheran”) appeals from the trial court’s order compelling Lutheran to provide full and complete responses to a broad set of discovery requests that it claims are privileged by statute. For the reasons below, the trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions that the trial court conduct an in-camera inspection of the documents requested.
{¶ 2} Plaintiffs-appellees Kevin L. Trangle, M.D., and Betty Trangle (“the Trangles”) filed this medical malpractice action against Cesar Rojas, M.D.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Jacobs v. FrankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Albain v. Flower HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Lightbody v. RustOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Huntsman v. Aultman HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Northeast Professional Home Care, Inc. v. Advantage Home Health Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Tenan v. HustonOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Scott Process Sys., Inc. v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Patterson v. Zdanski, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.