Arnold v. Keil
Appellate Court of Illinois
' Assumpsit, for goods sold. Trial in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County, on appeal from a justice of the peace; the Hon. William HartZELL, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; appeal by defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington
This case might be affirmed for non-compliance with the rule requiring a complete abstract. Were it not for the statement of counsel for appellant in his brief, we would be at a loss to know from the abstract what parties were sued in the first place, for what they were sued, or what judgment was rendered or who appealed. Errors in the abstract are also pointed out by appellee, but having corrected them in his brief and not relying upon them, they will be considered as waived.
Appellant assigns as errors the instructions given for appellee; the refusal of instructions asked by appellant and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. McCartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Smedley v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Frost v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Hudson v. King Bros.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1887
- Schlesinger v. KeiferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berow v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- White v. NeelandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. StanwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
- Chicago Manual Training School Ass'n v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
- Whitney, Inc. v. MandelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.