Legal Opinion

Warfield v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 9, 1930No. 5461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants were convicted of using the mails in furtherance'of a scheme to defraud. The only errors relied on run to the exclusion of certain evidence and the remarks of counsel for the government.

In general terms, the fraudulent scheme described in the indictment was this: Appellants, and two other named persons, acquired from the state of Texas the fee-simple title to the surface rights of 160 acres of land and certain mineral permits to prospect for coal, lignite, and sulphur on the public lands of the state; they organized under the name of the Great Southern Sulphur…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  2. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
  3. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. KortepeterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. CASCIANO v. CITY OF PATERSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  5. MARTIN v. PISERCHIADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API