United States v. Kortepeter
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants challenge judgments of imprisonment and fines imposed after verdicts of guilt were rendered against them. They were charged with, fraudulently diverting W.P.A. funds, fraudulently diverting W. P.A services, and conspiring to defraud the United States by doing the aforesaid, and other illegal acts.
Their alleged misdeeds arose out of the use of W.P.A. labor and funds in laying two streets in a fourteen acre tract of farm land owned entirely by Derbyshire, who was planning to subdivide the tract. Korte-peter, his son-in-law, was the “co-ordinator” of the W.P.A.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crumpton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Vause v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kortepeter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940