State v. Hurt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.
At the outset it should be noted that the alleged illegal confrontation came before the indictment of March 18, 1969.
*88Although some courts have restricted United States v. Wade (1967), 388 U. S. 218, and Gilbert v. California (1967), 388 U. S. 263, to post-indictment confrontations, as in People v. Palmer (1969), 41 Ill. 2d 571, 244 N. E. 2d 173, we adopt the view expressed in State v. Isaacs (1970), 24 Ohio App. 2d 115, 117: “. . . the better view, the one most responsive to the reasoning in the Wade and Gilbert cases . . . is that the Wade and Gilbert rules extend to any lineup conducted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SheardonOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. LathanOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. TinglerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. Fields, Belmont County Courts, Ohio1979
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.