Legal Opinion

Bierschenk v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1965No. 35814PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrower, J.

The appellants, Ernest Bierschenk and 11 other resident landowners and taxpayers in the area affected, as plaintiffs, brought this action on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated. Its purpose was to enjoin the City of Omaha, Nebraska, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as. the city, its mayor, council, and other officers who were joined with it as defendants and who are appellees in this court, from enforcing ordinance No. 22649 of said city by which a large portion of an area known as Keystone and Benson Gardens was annexed to the city.

On appropriate pleadings; to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wagner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Village of Niobrara v. TichyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Johnson v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Sullivan v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Shields v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API