Legal Opinion

Coleman v. REPUBLIC INDEM. INS. CO. OF CAL.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2005No. B172638PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, Acting P. J.

In Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Companies (1988) 46 Cal.3d 287 [250 Cal.Rptr. 116, 758 P.2d 58] (Moradi-Shalal), the Supreme Court held that a third party claimant—an individual who is injured by the alleged negligence of an insured party—does not have a private right of action against the insurer for unfair settlement practices. This case presents the question, one of first impression in California, of whether that rule applies where the third party claimant is insured by the same insurer as the other party.

We hold that Moradi-Shalal bars such an action…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wong v. JingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Mintz v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Bock v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Hailey v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Akin v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API