Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Merritt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1953No. 19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaenhill, J.

The fifth issue submitted to the jury in the original trial involves a question of law. The answer thereto was for the judge and not for the jury. It constitutes no proper basis for a judgment requiring plaintiff to continue to pay defendant alimony after the dissolution of the marital status.

G.S. 50-11 expressly provides that “After a judgment of divorce from the bonds of matrimony, all rights arising out of the marriage shall cease and determine . . .” The judge entering a decree of divorce a vinculo is without jurisdiction to enter an order requiring the husband to continue to support his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Livingston v. LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Levitch v. LevitchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API