Legal Opinion

State v. Rush

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 27, 2007No. 2007, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeborah S. Eyler, J.

In its murder prosecution against Cindi Renee Katherine Rush, the State has appealed a pre-trial ruling by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County suppressing from evidence inculpatory statements Rush gave to the police. The State asks whether the circuit court erred in ruling that the statements were obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Rush maintains that the Miranda ruling was correct but asks, beyond that, • whether the suppression ruling should be upheld because, contrary to the alternative ruling of the circuit court, her…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. State v. PhillipsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Choate v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. State v. HailesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. State v. McNealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API