Legal Opinion

Rich v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 29, 1997No. 2960451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stephen Lamar Rich sued his insurance carrier, Colonial Insurance Company of California (the "insurer"), seeking uninsured motorist benefits. The facts of the case are largely undisputed and arise from an attempted car-jacking. Rich had stopped in his automobile at a traffic signal in Atlanta, Georgia, when he was approached by two men. One of the men shot Rich when Rich refused to hand over his keys and his money. Rich escaped his assailants; however, the bullet severed his colon, and he was hospitalized for 11 days.

The trial court determined that Rich was not entitled to uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. T.L.K. v. T.K.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Taliaferro v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API