Legal Opinion

Odom v. Pinkston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1946No. 9553PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

The parties will be designated as in the trial court.

Plaintiff, Jack Pinkston dba Transportation Insurance Agency, sued defendant, L. A. Odom, upon “a promissory note and/or written instrument,” and on June 25, 1945, recovered a default judgment in the sum of $700.18, with 10% interest per annum thereon. On November 1, 1945, defendant filed this appeal by writ of error from said judgment.

The note sued upon was offered in evidence, and reads as follows:

“Transportation Insurance Agency
“Transportation Insurance Specialists
“Installment Premium Agreement
“$471.50 Stanton, Texas, Dec.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hanley v. Oil Capital Broadcasting Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Carver v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Black v. DruryTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Burleson v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Higdon v. Shelton Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Graham v. San Antonio MacHine and Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. White v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Roberts v. MullenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Kelley v. First National Bank of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API