People v. Terry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that his right to counsel was violated is without merit. The defendant effectively waived his right to counsel. In People v Bing (76 NY2d 331), the Court of Appeals held that knowledge of a prior pending charge against the defendant did not impose upon the police a duty to inquire as to whether the defendant was represented by counsel and was not a bar to the waiver of the defendant’s right to counsel with regard to new, unrelated charges (see, People v Goodman, 166 AD2d 541, 542; People v Edwards, 172 AD2d 556). Therefore, in this case, that the police may have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. DiazNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. MageeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.